Login

Lost your password?
Don't have an account? Sign Up

Is Software As A Service (SaaS) a bad thing?

Is Software as a Service (SaaS) necessarily a bad thing? Are online, company hosted applications (like Office 365, Google Docs, etc.) all bad? Are there good ways to do SaaS? If a SaaS application/website is compliant with the AGPL… is that… good?

More info, MP3 RSS Feed, & how to support the show:

== Made possible by ==

Amazing Laptops with Free Software and hardware kill switches.
Purism:

Amazing servers and workstations, powered by Linux.
Pogo Linux:

Amazing 3D Printers.
LulzBot 3D Printers:

https://www.saas.place

33 comments

    1. SimGunther

      @Mathias Kandelborg I hope that you understand that programs that can just be downloadable like word processors, games not requiring an internet connection, and other applications that can be easily run on someone’s low powered computer but are served as SaaS are what I have a problem with. If it’s SaaS that provides a service that a typical PC could never support on its own without infrastructure of other interacting services in the company to provide a tangible benefit for the user, that is totally fine with me.

    2. Mathias Kandelborg

      @SimGunther It’s mostly not a bad idea to continually spend money in order to keep things going. What happens when you stop maintaining whatever?

      Paying each month makes sure you don’t have to do that job.

    3. SimGunther

      The reason I hate SaaS: it presumes that you want to “rent” time with the software rather than let you have it on your computer forever. Innovation, yeah right; let’s all go back to the future… the future of 1975 where time sharing was a thing – __ –

  1. PixelOutlaw

    I still use AutoCAD 2004. The newer versions are Software as a Slavery. You’re not allowed to own AutoCAD you just keep paying the monthly bill to keep grandma on life support.
    One good example of a locally hosted service is OpenFire. We put together out own Ubuntu server and it meets the needs of a 30 person office at a Fortune 500 company.

  2. Cyrus Vorazan

    It’s actually a huge problem in the gaming industry right now, online-only games keep getting shut down like no one’s business, and if you liked the game or paid anything for it – tough luck, it’s not coming back.

    1. Cyrus Vorazan

      @Ari Finkelman even though you say 99.99% of the players don’t care about the game when it’s being shut down, conversely in 99.99% of the cases there are still players that do care about it, unless the game dies just a few days/weeks after launch. But the point is, any game that becomes perpetually unplayable is a waste, and it could be prevented if companies followed an ethical way to handle SaaS end-of-life events.
      I don’t play many online-only games myself, so I can’t give many examples, but as a Planetside 2 player I do know that Planetside 1 was shut down not long ago while it still had lots of active players, and there’s no reason to think that this will not happen to Planetside 2 in the future.
      In any case, if you want a thorough (and opinionated) coverage of the issue, I’d direct you to a youtuber known as Ross Scott, he has a few videos on “Dead Game News”, and in particular he talks about it in his episodes about Battleforge, Darkspore and The Secret World.

    2. Ari Finkelman

      While it does happen, I wouldnt say it is a “huge problem.” I have yet to play a game that no longer works, but then Im not playing online-only games that are over a decade old. By the time the servers go offline, 99.99% of the players have long since moved on to another game and will never give that game a second thought.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

*
*